Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2512 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in Halo Infinite than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 164 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |