Buy on Amazon
$110
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 109 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-7400 Quad-core (4 Core) 3 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack (D132)
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
