Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2267 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 130 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 279 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 64 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1675
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9350 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |