Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 322 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 23 than FX-8350 - 162 vs 150 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $112.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |