Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3038 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 16% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 180 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$111.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $111.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
518
23.642172523961662%
Multi-Core
1607
18.03591470258137%
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |