Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 2800 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |