Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2267 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 130 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 273 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 64 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
273
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1675
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |