Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1545M v5 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1545M v5 is 503 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 343 vs 334 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1545M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1545M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Single-Core
1247
100%
Multi-Core
3999
74.3584975827445%
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
71.05052125100241%
Multi-Core
5378
100%
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
