Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1274 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 128 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$360
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $360 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |