Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2634 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 68% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 230 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$575
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Single-Core
1223
39.388083735909824%
Multi-Core
3828
17.533092108276463%
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |