Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2626 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 43% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 248 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1535M v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
