Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1535M v5 outperforms Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1535M v5 is 421 days newer than Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-5930K - 104 vs 102 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
102
98%
Value, $/FPS
$5.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$549.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |