Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3097 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 142 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $119.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |