Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2306 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 162 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 35 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
87 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |