Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2170 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 139 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
