Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1496 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |