Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2978 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1280 - 227 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
