Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3121 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1280 - 388 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 20 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
388
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$615
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |