Buy on Amazon
$1,075
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2707 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Xeon E3-1280 - 85 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 32 vs 8 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD295XA8AFWOF)
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
