Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 is 512 days older than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-4130 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |