Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 82 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $236 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1193
69.92966002344666%
Multi-Core
3874
47.58044706460329%
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |