Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1975 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 23% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 70 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
70
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |