Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2612 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 183 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |