Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1275 v3 is 272 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 183 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
46.554621848739494%
Multi-Core
1137
30.207226354941554%
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |