Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2226 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 166 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |