Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3788 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 156 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |