Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 3130 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 80 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1270 - 210 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$543
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $543 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 127 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |