Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1743 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 601 vs 547 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
601
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |