Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v5 is 1268 days newer than Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - 172 vs 157 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 77 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |