Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2844 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 263 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |