Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 3839 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 152 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 28 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1200
48.46526655896607%
Multi-Core
3875
36.66035950804163%
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
