Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 162 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |