Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1485 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 45 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 18% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 158 vs 134 FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$190
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 112 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |