Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 1409 days older than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 1600 - 54 vs 53 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |