Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1885 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1245 - 272 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |