Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1245 - 150 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1245
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1245
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
590
25.042444821731745%
Multi-Core
2017
16.42909505579539%
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
