Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 3158 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1245 - 541 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 64 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
541
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1675
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |