Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E3-1245 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1245 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1245 v5 - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$415
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $415 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |