Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1245 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than Xeon E3-1245 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1245 v3 - 213 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |