Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E3-1241 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2181 days newer than Xeon E3-1241 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 64 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $569.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |