Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 is 338 days older than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Xeon E5-2650 - 99 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |