Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 is 338 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 80 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Performs up to 0% better in Valorant than Xeon E3-1240 - 696 vs 693 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |