Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2978 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Xeon E3-1240 - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
