Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4580 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Xeon E3-1240 - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
