Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 3042 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E3-1240 - 235 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 28 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
