Buy on Amazon
$55.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 791 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E3-1240 - 241 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I5-4670S I5 4670S 3.1 GHz Used Quad-Core CPU Processor 6M 65W LGA 1150
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
