Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 1096 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 80 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 122 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 28 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$970.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $970.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |