Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 1311 days older than Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G4560 - 127 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 54 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $22.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
707
61.26516464471404%
Multi-Core
1452
38.87550200803213%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |