Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $273
Availability
MSRP in USD: $273
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3138 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 160 vs 156 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1154
71.99001871490954%
Multi-Core
3735
100%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.