Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1916 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 760 vs 749 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
760
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |